Heritage Foundation - Project 2025

https://www.project2025.org/policy

A Conservative Defense Budget for Fiscal Year 2025

Just in case if you wonder are the neocons warmongering again (as they always do!) It's le evil genocide Joe!!!

If I have to guess, I'd say the liberals are the ones forced on this path of suicide by le Right™ both in US and in Israel!

Key Takeaways

The Biden Administration’s official fiscal year 2025 defense budget request does not fund the military sufficiently and does not allocate resources appropriately.

...

President Joe Biden released his official FY 2025 Defense Budget Request in March 2024.1

U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer, United States Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request: Defense Budget Overview, March 2024, https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2025​/FY2025_Budget_Request_Overview_Book.pdf (accessed March 31, 2024). In this document, his Administration’s misguided priorities are on full display. While paying lip service to the concept of China as the primary challenge for the United States, the official request fails to align spending with strategy. Most egregiously, the request fails to procure the ships, aircraft, and munitions the military needs to deter China in the Indo-Pacific. It is, in a word, insufficient to keep the American people safe.

https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/conservative-defense-budget-fiscal-year-2025

"But le conservatives really care about muh balanced budget!!! America First!!!"

By contrast, to account for the historically high inflation levels throughout this Administration’s tenure and to provide a real increase in military capacity, the FY 2025 conservative budget calls for a roughly 3 percent overall increase over the official FY 2024 request (as opposed to the 1 percent increase called for in the President’s FY 2025 request) with procurement accounting for the majority of new funding. It also calls for procurement in addition to that new spending, to be funded by shifts from elsewhere within the defense budget.

https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/conservative-defense-budget-fiscal-year-2025

"But if we just support Blumpt they'd at least give us a free pass so they can focus on Chyna!!!"

Strengthening Burden-Sharing to Deter Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Prioritizing China does not mean ignoring other threats, but if the DOD is to defend the U.S. homeland and deny China’s imperial ambitions, it will be forced to do less in other areas. In Europe, that will require dramatic changes in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). As it stands, allies expect the United States to provide many of the forces required to deter or defeat a Russian assault on NATO’s eastern front, but many of those finite forces are also needed to deter or defeat China. As a result, as long as Washington is prioritizing China, it will be unable to provide these forces for Europe on the scale the continent expects.

This is the reality with which NATO must grapple—and U.S. allies must do so quickly. Specifically, they must take primary responsibility for Europe’s conventional defense by fielding most, if not all, of the conventional forces required to deter or deny Russian aggression against the Baltics, Poland, or Finland. This will allow NATO to deter Russia even as the DOD reassigns certain forces to the Indo-Pacific and divests itself of other capabilities.

At the same time, NATO allies must also take the lead in providing military aid to Ukraine, which will require additional arms to offset or overcome Russia’s manpower and materiel advantages for an indeterminate period of time. This will be vital to free U.S. stockpiles and production capacity—especially as the U.S. defense industry ramps up from its post–Cold War nadir—for higher priorities such as homeland defense, deterring China, and assistance to Israel.

The DOD must facilitate this transfer of responsibilities within NATO in coordination with other U.S. agencies. It should do so first by identifying forces requiring replacement, supporting U.S. and allied efforts to field those forces, and setting clear timelines for the transfer of certain U.S. forces from Europe to incentivize allied investments. U.S. forces will still provide an extended nuclear deterrent to NATO. Finally, the DOD should provide select conventional forces to NATO that do not detract from its ability to deter China.

...

Hard Choices. Even if the United States raises defense spending significantly in the coming years, it will take years more to convert those spending increases into combat power. The United States will therefore be required to rely more heavily on its allies and partners to deter and defend against threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea while U.S. forces focus first on defending the U.S. homeland and denying China’s imperial ambitions.

https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/conservative-defense-budget-fiscal-year-2025

So tell me again WTF are there to gain from shilling Trump and GOP again? Did it ever do anything? No? Then why the fuck are people still doing it? The based™ thing Trump proposed even in 2016 was to make EU pay its "fair share" for NATO. Guess what that means? Oh yeah, exactly the thing above! EU takes on Russia while US takes on China! Which is also happening right now! As in what happened in the last few months! Do you get what the GOP/Trump's plans are now? OMG they are so friendly to Russia bro!!!!

Your reminder to just jail/kill any and all CIA/MI6/Mossad spies and everyone associated with them on the spot without question or trial! Do you wonder why there are so many "accidents" in Russia and Iran? Here's your fucking answer! CIA and Zionist sympathizers! You just have to get rid of all of them! If you want to win it's the only way to not have the CIA knowing everything you do! Physically prevent them! Do not allow them free travel without surveillance at least! And yes, every single one associated with BAP @bronzeagemantis on x.com is either CIA or Zionist!

The Indo-Pacific

China is the primary challenge to American security, and the Indo-Pacific should therefore be the focus of U.S. military operations.

• The DOD and other U.S. government agencies should intensify intelligence-gathering about Chinese forces to allow the United States to engage high-value targets quickly in the event of a conflict.

https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/conservative-defense-budget-fiscal-year-2025

In case you want an explanation of why Ukrainian aid was "halted" for the last few months! It was to force the Europeans to cough up their shekels! (They actually weren't fucking even, just go back and check the videos of various tank/supplies movements via rail to Romania and Poland, and then there's the big aid pack GOP and Trump just pushed though a few weeks ago!)

Europe

As the U.S. pivots to the Indo–Pacific, allied nations in Europe must take primary responsibility for their own security. Specifically:

• The United States must focus on the Indo-Pacific and will need to shift funding, equipment, and personnel away from Europe and to the Indo-Pacific. Funding, equipment, and personnel that have previously been allocated to the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) will need to shift to the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM).
• The United States will nevertheless maintain bases and troops in Europe and remains committed to NATO. The Alliance continues to be the primary guarantor of security in the North Atlantic.
• European countries must spend more on their militaries, hitting at least 2 percent of GDP spending on their defense budgets while striving for 3 percent. There has been modest but welcome progress on this front by some NATO members since the invasion of Ukraine, but many are still falling short, and increased defense spending will be necessary for years to come to make up for the lack of attention that European countries and Canada have paid to their militaries over the past several decades.
• European countries must lead on military aid to Ukraine. The United States must prioritize deterring China in the Indo-Pacific, and European countries must take primary responsibility for European security.

https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/conservative-defense-budget-fiscal-year-2025

"GOP's so concerned about America First and the domestic issues bro! They are on the same page with us! Culture conservatives unite!"

The Middle East

The United States must not allow attacks on its forces in the Middle East or anywhere else.The failure of the Biden Administration to respond forcefully to attacks on American personnel has emboldened U.S. adversaries and makes future attacks more likely. The DOD and the U.S. should:

https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/conservative-defense-budget-fiscal-year-2025

Well at least there's also something funny here!

Obesity has become one of the top medically disqualifying conditions for prospective recruits—a negative trend that is likely to continue as adolescent obesity rates are expected to increase to 24.2 percent by 2030, up from 21 percent in 2017. If the military hopes to address and overcome this challenge, it needs to engage with American youth much earlier. Congress should provide funding for the military to increase the number of programs available to help prospective recruits lose weight at the recruiting office before shipping out to basic training. The military could also establish stronger partnerships between recruiters and high school physical education classes.16

Thomas W. Spoehr, “Improving America’s Long-Term Military Recruiting Outlook,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3657, October 5, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/improving-americas-long-term-military-recruiting-outlook.

"They are trying to take away burgers from le burgers!!!"

"Fight DEI goy! DEI is so evil! We must make the US military strong!!!" So again why are people so eager to help their own destruction again? You know they aren't going to go even slightly easier on you just because you helped them bring down DEI or whatever right? Mark my words, conservative or liberal, they both love the sight of a gay black man sucking a Latinx dick! It's just what Americans do!

The FY 2025 conservative defense budget includes recommendations that the DOD:

• Eliminate all diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and positions.

https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/conservative-defense-budget-fiscal-year-2025

I have a theory on what actually causes people to want to be gay and trans, but that's a whole other issue! See the post I made a few days ago on the Chinese Zionist tranny!

Funny enough I think the Israeli flag actually got removed from their username? It's now a Korean flag?

Section 2: The Common Defense

"Plz helb end DEI saars!"

Yet the Department of Defense “is a deeply troubled institution.” It has emphasized leftist politics over military readiness, “Recruiting was the worst in 2022 that it has been in two generations,” and “the Biden Admin- istration’s profoundly unserious equity agenda and vaccine mandates have taken a serious toll.” Additionally, Miller writes that “the atrophy of our defense industrial base, the impact of sequestration, and effective disarmament by many U.S. allies have exacted a high toll on America’s military.” Moreover, our military has adopted a risk-averse culture—think of masked soldiers, sailors, and airmen—rather than instilling and rewarding courage in thought and action.

The good news is that most enlisted personnel, and most officers, especially below the rank of general or admiral, continue to be patriotic defenders of liberty.

But this is now Barack Obama’s general officer corps. That is why Russ Vought argues in Chapter 2 that the National Security Council “should rigorously review all general and flag officer promotions to prioritize the core roles and responsibilities of the military over social engineering and non-defense related matters, including climate change, critical race theory, manufactured extremism, and other polarizing policies that weaken our armed forces and discourage our nation’s finest men and women from enlisting.” Ensuring that many of America’s best and brightest continue to choose military service is essential.

“By far the most significant danger” to America from abroad, Miller writes, “is China.” That communist regime “is undertaking a historic military buildup,” which “could result in a nuclear force that matches or exceeds America’s own nuclear arsenal.” Resisting Chinese expansionist aims “requires a denial defense” whereby we make “the subordination of Taiwan or other U.S. allies in Asia prohibitively difficult.” However, Miller adds that “[c]ritically, the United States must be able to do this at a level of cost and risk that Americans are willing to bear.”

Again why the fuck are people helping to do the "save le West" bit again? We should be aiming to inflict costs that Americans are NOT willing to bear instead! Not increasing their based™ conservative LARP!

You aren't saving le West, you are saving the Zionist enslavement system from collapsing! So yes it's signing up for and helping your own God damn enslavement!

Think Trump once you read the line in bold. (Don't mind too much the 4 wars they lost!)

The best gauge of such willingness is congressional approval. Accordingly, we must rediscover and adhere to the Founders’ wise division of war powers, whereby Congress, the most representative and deliberative branch, decides whether to go to war; and the executive, the most energetic and decisive branch, decides how to carry it out once begun. As the past 75 years have repeatedly demonstrated in different ways—from Korea, to Vietnam, to Iraq, to Afghanistan—we depart from our constitutional design at our peril.

Also just in case people think a based™ RW™ Trump can save them from the State Department liberals! Presidents come and go but the civil servants in the State Department stays!

An effective diplomatic corps is central to defending our interests and influencing world events. Whereas most military personnel have had leftist priorities imposed from above, the problem at State comes largely from within. Former State Department director of policy planning Kiron Skinner writes in Chapter 6, “[L]arge swaths of the State Department’s workforce are left-wing and predisposed to disagree with a conservative President’s policy agenda and vision.” She adds that the department possesses a “belief that it is an independent institution that knows what is best for the United States, sets its own foreign policy, and does not need direction from an elected President”—a view that does not align with the Constitution.

Again why are people helping to strengthen the conservative/Trump hand again?

The solution to this problem is strong political leadership. Skinner writes, “The next Administration must take swift and decisive steps to reforge the department into a lean and functional diplomatic machine that serves the President and, thereby, the American people.” Because the Senate has been extraordinarily lax in fulfilling its constitutional obligation to confirm presidential appointees, she recommends putting appointees into acting roles until such time as the Senate confirms them.

Skinner writes that State should also stop skirting the Constitution’s treaty-making requirements and stop enforcing “agreements” as treaties. It should encourage more trade with allies, particularly with Great Britain, and less with adversaries. And it should implement a “sovereign Mexico” policy, as our neighbor

“has functionally lost its sovereignty to muscular criminal cartels that effectively run the country.” In Africa, Skinner writes, the U.S. “should focus on core security, economic, and human rights” rather than impose radical abortion and pro-LGBT initiatives. Divisive symbols such as the rainbow flag or the Black Lives Matter flag have no place next to the Stars and Stripes at our embassies.

When it comes to China, Skinner writes that “a policy of ‘compete where we must, but cooperate where we can’...has demonstrably failed.” The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) “aggressive behavior,” she writes, “can only be curbed through external pressure.” Efforts to protect or excuse China must stop. She observes,

“[M]any were quick to dismiss even the possibility that COVID escaped from a Chinese research laboratory.” Meanwhile, Skinner writes, “[g]lobal leaders including President Joe Biden...have tried to normalize or even laud Chinese behavior.” She adds, “In some cases, these voices, like global corporate giants BlackRock and Disney”—or the National Basketball Association (NBA)—“directly benefit from doing business with Beijing.”

Again completely no mentioning of the fact.... Fucking US funded the Wuhan lab! The GOP loves to hawk on Fauci in the congress but now here it's completely China's fault!

If you work with the Americans (Zionist Jews) this is what you fucking get! Everything that goes well is their doing, everything bad is 100% your fault!

Was it Trump that ended NordStream? Oh yeah it was!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50875935

"Nord Stream 2: Trump approves sanctions on Russia gas pipeline

President Donald Trump has signed a law that will impose sanctions on any firm that helps Russia's state-owned gas company, Gazprom, finish a pipeline into the European Union."

Who the fuck blew it up? Oh yeah CIA who loves Trump (and Zionism!) Who started Ukrainian war? Oh yeah CIA!

Tell me again how great Trump/GOP is for Russia again? Basic Divide and Conquer shit they love so much!

To finish this Section 2 summary up.... These faggots actually think the CIA isn't insane enough for them! All those insane CIA faggots LARPing as dogs online (NAFO) are not insane enough for our based™ conservatives! It's "overly cautious"...? Just in case you wonder how insane the GOP actually is!

Former chief of staff for the director of National Intelligence Dustin Carmack writes in Chapter 7 that the U.S. Intelligence Community is too inclined to look in the rearview mirror, engage in “groupthink,” and employ an “overly cautious” approach aimed at personal approval rather than at offering the most accurate, unvarnished intelligence for the benefit of the country.

Chapter 4: Department of Defense

You know, stop abiding by the SF agreement and stop the export control! There's no sense in not playing dirty with them since they always play dirty! Also time to further cripple Apple, they want to move to India anyways, help them with that move! With the launch of Apple Vision being a dud and the clear lack of vision there's a solid chance Apple will go down in the next 10 years! This is an unprecedented opportunity to bring down one of the most valuable company in US history!

Our disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, our impossibly muddled China strategy, the growing involvement of senior military officers in the political arena, and deep confusion about the purpose of our military are clear signals of a disturbng decay and markers of a dangerous decline in our nation’s capabilities and will. Additionally, more than 100,000 Americans die annually in large measure because of illicit narcotics flows—more than four times as many people in one year as we lost in our 20-year war against al-Qaeda.

Use that power, fund more wars! Play dirtier! Teach them a fucking lesson via Israel/Yemen/Iran! That's the one thing they HAVE to care about! Take a more aggressive role and fund Yemen/Iran more! If Israel gets attacked they HAVE to drain their resources and defend it! That's the one play they would HAVE to answer! (Not to mention Middle East and oil! Stop caring about fucking Africans and fund ME!)

DOD POLICY

By far the most significant danger to Americans’ security, freedoms, and pros- perity is China. China is by any measure the most powerful state in the world other than the United States itself. It apparently aspires to dominate Asia and then, from that position, become globally preeminent. If Beijing could achieve this goal, it could dramatically undermine America’s core interests, including by restricting

Priority No. 4: Demand financial transparency and accountability.
This chapter offers recommendations for improving our armed forces and the

Prioritize a denial defense against China. U.S. defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan.

U.S. access to the world’s most important market. Preventing this from happening must be the top priority for American foreign and defense policy.

Beijing presents a challenge to American interests across the domains of national power, but the military threat that it poses is especially acute and signif- icant. China is undertaking a historic military buildup that includes increasing capability for power projection not only in its own region, but also far beyond as well as a dramatic expansion of its nuclear forces that could result in a nuclear force that matches or exceeds America’s own nuclear arsenal.

Again, none of these countries really matter that much compared to the Middle East! Let them arm the Philippinxes, go and fucking arm Muslims! Make costs everywhere prohibitively expensive for them!

Don't stall so they can reindustrialize! Start more shit now so they can never catch up with the manufacturing capacity needed!

The most severe immediate threat that Beijing’s military poses, however, is to Taiwan and other U.S. allies along the first island chain in the Western Pacific. If China could subordinate Taiwan or allies like the Philippines, South Korea, and Japan, it could break apart any balancing coalition that is designed to prevent Beijing’s hegemony over Asia. Accordingly, the United States must ensure that China does not succeed. This requires a denial defense: the ability to make the subordination of Taiwan or other U.S. allies in Asia prohibitively difficult. Critically, the United States must be able to do this at a level of cost and risk that Americans are willing to bear given the relative importance of Taiwan to China and to the U.S.

The United States and its allies also face real threats from Russia, as evidenced by Vladimir Putin’s brutal war in Ukraine, as well as from Iran, North Korea, and transnational terrorism at a time when decades of ill-advised military operations in the Greater Middle East, the atrophy of our defense industrial base, the impact of sequestration, and effective disarmament by many U.S. allies have exacted a high toll on America’s military.

This is a grim landscape. The United States needs to deal with these threats forthrightly and with strength, but it also needs to be realistic. It cannot wish away these problems. Rather, it must confront them with a clear-eyed recognition of the need for choice, discipline, and adequate resources for defense.

In this light, U.S. defense strategy must identify China unequivocally as the top priority for U.S. defense planning while modernizing and expanding the U.S. nuclear arsenal and sustaining an efficient and effective counterterrorism enterprise. U.S. allies must also step up, with some joining the United States in taking on China in Asia while others take more of a lead in dealing with threats from Russia in Europe, Iran, the Middle East, and North Korea. The reality is that achieving these goals will require more spending on defense, both by the United States and by its allies, as well as active support for reindustrialization and more support for allies’ productive capacity so that we can scale our free- world efforts together.

"The based™ conservatives are going to let Russia go!"

How about we just drop the supporting RW™ retard shit? Stop supporting le West vs le Rest narrative? Break EU members off from US if you can! Stop throwing them all to Trump! Make it a policy to make it clear to EU they are funding and digging their own graves! If they prefer to lick US's balls then support actual oppositions instead of doing the retard RW™ shit! (Hint: they are all like Milei! Zionists who love sucking US's ball more!)

Increase allied conventional defense burden-sharing. U.S. allies must take far greater responsibility for their conventional defense. U.S. allies must play their part not only in dealing with China, but also in dealing with threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea.

1. Make burden-sharing a central part of U.S. defense strategy with the United States not just helping allies to step up, but strongly encouraging them to do so.
2. Support greater spending and collaboration by Taiwan and allies in the Asia–Pacific like Japan and Australia to create a collective defense model.
3. Transform NATO so that U.S. allies are capable of fielding the great majority of the conventional forces required to deter Russia while relying on the United States primarily for our nuclear deterrent, and select other capabilities while reducing the U.S. force posture in Europe.
4. Sustain support for Israel even as America empowers Gulf partners to take responsibility for their own coastal, air, and missile defenses both individually and working collectively.
5. Enable South Korea to take the lead in its conventional defense against North Korea.

...

DOD FOREIGN MILITARY SALES

The United States must regain its role as the “Arsenal of Democracy.” In fiscal year (FY) 2021, U.S. government foreign military sales (FMS) nosedived to a low of $34.8 billion from a record high of $55.7 billion in FY 2018.8 This decrease hinders interoperability with partners and allies, decreases defense industrial base capacity, and increases the taxpayer burden on the U.S. military’s own procurements. Under previous Administrations, the United States built its reputation as a reliable partner with a strong defense industrial base that could supply military articles and goods in a timely manner. Today’s FMS process is encumbered by byzantine bureaucracy, long contracting times, high costs, and mundane technology.

The United States can change this downward trajectory by improving inter- nal processes that incentivize partners and allies to procure U.S. defense systems, thereby expanding our “defense ecosystem.” We must reverse the recent dip in FMS to ensure both that our partners remain interoperable with the United States and that our defense industrial base regains much-needed capacity in preparation for future challenges.

"The based™ GOP cares about Democratic Process so much!!!"

End informal congressional notification. Informal congressional notification or “tiered review” is a hinderance to ensuring timely sales to our global partners. The tiered review process is not codified in law; it is merely a practice by which the Department of State provides a preview of prospective arms transfers before Congress is formally notified.9

1. End the tiered review process to eliminate at least 20 days from the FMS process.
2. Use the tiered review process only when unanimous congressional support is guaranteed in order to eliminate the “weaponization” by select Members of Congress that has prevented billions of dollars of arms sales from moving into formal congressional notification.

Dr. Costin.... I am afraid the GOP wants to fire you and prevent you from living your military dreams....! Vote Biden 2024 to save your military fantasy! Notice they still would allow gays though!

Restore standards of lethality and excellence. Entrance criteria for military service and specific occupational career fields should be based on the needs of those positions. Exceptions for individuals who are already predisposed to require medical treatment (for example, HIV positive or suffering from gender dysphoria) should be removed, and those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service. Physical fitness requirements should be based on the occupational field without consideration of gender, race, ethnicity, or orientation.

"All the NAFOs on X dot com are Dems who hate Trump!!!"

• Align collection and analysis with vital national interests (countering China and Russia).
• Establish an effective global federated intelligence framework
  with allies and partners and our Combatant Commands. Avoid the temptation to neglect areas that appear less pertinent but that support a convergence of threats and the critical requirements to sustain those threats.

Expand the integration of intelligence activities. The prevalence of asymmetric warfare requires Defense Intelligence to leverage the unique authorities and capabilities of U.S. departments and agencies, as well as our partners and allies, to competitive advantage.

1. Create an improved cyber defense and capability. We must reevaluate the dual-hat structure between the National Security Agency (NSA) and U.S. Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM).
2. Rebuild human intelligence (HUMINT) and counterintelligence (CI) and improve their integration with defensive and offensive cyber operations.

"You should help people to trust GOP and expose crooked Biden!!!"

Restore accountability and public trust. In recent years, public trust in Defense Intelligence has been eroded by, for example, flawed assumptions leading up to our Afghanistan withdrawal, flawed Russia–Ukraine assessments, divergences in relations with key Gulf allies, and voids being filled by Russia and China around the world. For trust to be restored and sustained, officials must be held accountable.

1. Restore DIE critical thinking. Establish mechanisms to restore analytic integrity and return to true intelligence-driven operations. The next Administration should eliminate the conflict of interest in the current customer-based model (in which the customer is always right) by enforcing time-tested procedures that guarantee independent analysis, even if it means challenging policymakers’ assumptions. The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security’s leadership role should be expanded to include providing analytic top-line views and improve DIE transparency by highlighting diverging views.
2. Elevate the DIE’s voice in national policy discussions, commensurate with the DIE’s 75 percent share of the IC budget. Present defense intelligence to senior policymakers, either independently to avoid all-source bias or in consensus products like the National Intelligence Estimates.

Again helping GOP is literally helping the US national defense and fucking ourselves over!

Oh just in case why people wonder Army's full of gay dudes and usually forced to take experimental vaccines! (Look it up, it's more than just Covid vax!) US Army is literally just test dummies for them! (Well maybe they'll consider taking a pause now they need grunts to fight Russia and China again!)

Transform Army culture and training. The Army can no longer serve as the nation’s social testing ground. A rebuilt Army that is focused again on its core warfighting mission and empowered it with the tools, resources, and authorities it needs to accomplish that mission must be the next Administration’s highest defense priority.

1. Stop using the Army as a test bed for social evolution. Misusing the Army in this way detracts from its core purpose while doing little to reshape the American social structure. The Army no longer reflects national demographics to the degree that it did before 1974 when the draft was eliminated.

"GOP stands for Law and Order!!!..?"

1. Transform USMC force structure.
   1. Eliminate all USMC law enforcement battalions.
   2. Transform at least one Marine Infantry Regiment into a Marine Littoral Regiment.
   3. Reduce the size of remaining infantry battalions.

This is on Trump's Space Force! So yes, US is the one looking to militarize space!

The U.S. Space Force (USSF) was established to assure continuous global and theater combat support from space, to deter attacks against U.S. space assets, and to prevail in space should deterrence fail. The USSF posture was conceived as a balance of offensive and defensive deterrent capabilities designed for maximum effectiveness.

Needed Reforms

Reverse the Biden Administration’s defensive posture. The Biden Administration has eliminated almost all offensive deterrence capabilities and instead will rely solely on defensive capabilities of disaggregation, maneuver, and reconstitution—the most costly, the slowest, and ultimately the most fragile architecture selection.

"The GOP is so for free markets! It's the God damn Biden Dems sanctioning Russia!"

Counter China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) globally. DOD, in conjunction with the Interagency, allies, and partner nations, must work proactively to counter China’s BRI around the globe.

1. Task USSOCOM and corresponding organizations in the Pentagon with conceptualizing, resourcing, and executing regionally based operations to counter the BRI with a focus on nations that are key to our energy policy, international supply chains, and our defense industrial base.
2. Use regional and global information operations to highlight Chinese violations of Exclusive Economic Zones, violations of human rights, and coercion along Chinese fault lines in Xinjiang Province, Hong Kong, and Taiwan in addition to China’s weaponization of sovereign debt.
3. Directly counter Chinese economic power with all elements of national power in North America, Central America, and the Caribbean to maintain maritime freedom of movement and protect the digital infrastructure of nations in the region.

Again this is under the section of... Department of Defense! But muh free market right?

This is funny because they actually, yes actually, mentioned the Left (in capital letters) in this...?

Missile defense has been underprioritized and underfunded in recent years. In light of these growing threats, the incoming Administration should treat missile defense as a top priority.

Needed Reforms

Champion the benefits of missile defense. Despite its deterrence and damage-limitation benefits, opponents argue incorrectly that U.S. missile defense is destabilizing because it threatens Russian and Chinese second- strike capabilities.

1. Reject claims made by the Left that missile defense is destabilizing while acknowledging that Russia and China are developing their own advanced missile defense systems.
2. Commit to keeping homeland missile defense off the table in any arms control negotiations with Russia and China.42